-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UDP or ESPHome #136
Comments
Yes, but several other topics have higher priority, so sorry but this may take a while. |
uKL for what do you plan to use UDP based communication? Because of Loxone integration? If yes Loxberry with MQTT Sever works pretty. I also first thought UDP would be great to have. But the MQTT integration has huge benefit for Loxone. https://wiki.loxberry.de/konfiguration/widget_help/widget_mqtt |
Yes, for Loxone. I'd be using MQTT for now but for stability I'd like to make it independent of my Loxberry Instance like I have it for other ESP32 based sensors. |
Hi. Where do you have stability issues? I’ve the same setup but actually have the feeling that it runs stable |
In general it is stable. Conceptually, I’m having an idea of making critical items like security, heating, electricity, independent of Loxberry - just in case. |
Hi, this makes sense. Less parts more reliable. |
Well, it depends. If the heatpump would be stuck in DHW heating disabled, this means that there's no hot water in the shower ;-) Wife acceptance factor = -1 ... and his had happened with the cloud integration for a few times. |
That’s definitely an issue |
I purchased "older" model just because of lack of UDP functionality, using budulinek setup now with loxone, but if UDP will come into place , I am ready to do purchase again . Thanks Arnold for all this ! |
Hello,
Are you considering adding support for UDP based communication or creating ESP Home based configuration?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: