Bicep ACR registry namespaces #5593
-
Hi all, I was wondering what the collective wisdom is around namespaces in Bicep ACR registries? Instead of reinventing the wheel, would it make sense to follow the {provider-namespace}/{resource-type} pattern we see in the ARM template reference? e.g. something like this: (ensuring names are lower case and spaces are replaced with hyphens)
This could possibly be a reasonable approach given it's the pattern we see when we create a resource in a Bicep file and could exhibit less cognitive load. What have people tried and what's worked well? Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Still trying to work on the best approach for this myself, so am interested to hear suggestions from others on what they're doing The above looks good to me though, similar to what they're doing in the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Still trying to work on the best approach for this myself, so am interested to hear suggestions from others on what they're doing
The above looks good to me though, similar to what they're doing in the
ResourceModules
repo