Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential improvement with server sorting #67

Open
Dankergy opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Potential improvement with server sorting #67

Dankergy opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@Dankergy
Copy link

I think adding a secondary sorting for viewing servers by game mode and then players second would streamline finding servers instead of having to manually scroll through to find the most populated servers by game mode or map etc. Main Filter>Population>Ping.

Repository owner deleted a comment from amir1387aht Aug 27, 2024
@metalglove
Copy link
Collaborator

Correct me if I am wrong @tobibodamer, but I think when a filter is applied, servers who respond first to the refresh are already sorted by ping in the browser; as the servers with higher ping just get added later.

So, let's say you sort by occupation, and you have multiple where the occupation is 18/18, the servers with lower ping are added first.

@tobibodamer
Copy link
Collaborator

@metalglove Unfortunately this is not the case, as the sending takes a while and servers with worse ping respond before the later servers with good ping receive the response.

@Dankergy can you clarify what you mean sorting by main filter? Or do you just mean always having a secondary sorting for game mode?

@Bowhza
Copy link
Owner

Bowhza commented Aug 27, 2024

@Dankergy is saying that if you sort by any column, player count should be the secondary sort by default so the most populated servers are at the top.

@tobibodamer
Copy link
Collaborator

I see... yeah that would be an improvement. Lets see if its possible

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants