Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Significant fluctuations in resulting CMF and Fe/Mg #50

Open
nedahejazi opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Significant fluctuations in resulting CMF and Fe/Mg #50

nedahejazi opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@nedahejazi
Copy link

Hello @CaymanUnterborn

I have run "example_parallel_MR.py" without any changes, but I get different results for Fe/Mg and CMF every time I run the code. What is the reason? Is this because of degeneracy, number of iterations, or any other factor? Is there any solution for this problem?

@schulze61
Copy link
Collaborator

@nedahejazi I'm not Cayman, but I think I can help here. Since you are running the file without any changes, I'm guessing the num_pts parameter (line 169) is still set to 5. If so, try changing the num_pts parameter (line 169) to something like 100 and see if the outputs are more consistent from one run to the next. Hope this solves the issue!

@nedahejazi
Copy link
Author

Hello @schulze61
Thank you so much for your help. I have tried 100 and even 200. I noticed 200 results in smaller fluctuations.
Actual Fe/Mg has a large uncertainty, but I assumed best-fit Fe/Mg is the one of importance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants