You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have run "example_parallel_MR.py" without any changes, but I get different results for Fe/Mg and CMF every time I run the code. What is the reason? Is this because of degeneracy, number of iterations, or any other factor? Is there any solution for this problem?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@nedahejazi I'm not Cayman, but I think I can help here. Since you are running the file without any changes, I'm guessing the num_pts parameter (line 169) is still set to 5. If so, try changing the num_pts parameter (line 169) to something like 100 and see if the outputs are more consistent from one run to the next. Hope this solves the issue!
Hello @schulze61
Thank you so much for your help. I have tried 100 and even 200. I noticed 200 results in smaller fluctuations.
Actual Fe/Mg has a large uncertainty, but I assumed best-fit Fe/Mg is the one of importance.
Hello @CaymanUnterborn
I have run "example_parallel_MR.py" without any changes, but I get different results for Fe/Mg and CMF every time I run the code. What is the reason? Is this because of degeneracy, number of iterations, or any other factor? Is there any solution for this problem?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: