Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support the migration of DataPoints (and Device History?) #18

Open
nasr98 opened this issue Jul 16, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Support the migration of DataPoints (and Device History?) #18

nasr98 opened this issue Jul 16, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nasr98
Copy link

nasr98 commented Jul 16, 2020

With the device ID issue fixed, we are having issues migrating custom datapoints and the device history under said datapoints.

@rpeach-sag rpeach-sag added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 16, 2020
@rpeach-sag rpeach-sag changed the title Datapoint format/history migration issue Support the migration of DataPoints (and Device History?) Jul 16, 2020
@rpeach-sag
Copy link
Contributor

Supporting data points is a new feature for the migration-tool. Unfortunately I can't give a time scale for supporting new features but its definitely something we'll consider as we update the tool.

I don't know much about the device history that you refer to, do you have any extra information/examples/screenshots?

@nasr98
Copy link
Author

nasr98 commented Aug 10, 2020

Just as a note, this issue was resolved on our part a while back by creating a small python script which acted as a middleman between the 2 tenants. This may give an idea as to how this may be implemented in future versions. This script can be found at https://gist.github.com/nasr98/904e91311957dcb20351caeb05911e6f .

@mbay-ODW
Copy link

Any updates on that? Had several customer requests lately about that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants