You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your amazing work on the zero-shot captioning task. As shown in Table 1 of this paper, the zerocap's performance on COCO is as follows:
however, it seems different from the performance reported in Zerocap's paper and is shown as follows:
In this paper, did the Zerocap use different settings that resulted in this difference?
I would greatly appreciate your response.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is an interesting question. We did not reproduce ZeroCap's results but rather took them from Magic's paper. I guess in Magic's paper they improved ZeroCap method somehow. Although the results for ZeroCap are quite different, I think it doesn't effect the comparison as it is still way lower than Magic's and CapDec's.
Thanks for your amazing work on the zero-shot captioning task. As shown in Table 1 of this paper, the zerocap's performance on COCO is as follows:
however, it seems different from the performance reported in Zerocap's paper and is shown as follows:
In this paper, did the Zerocap use different settings that resulted in this difference?
I would greatly appreciate your response.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: