-
Is it possible, within the Wflow_sbm framework, to derive Q_river results while explicitly separating the contributions of subsurface and overland flow components? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 5 comments 3 replies
-
Yes, in wflow you can add |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for your response. I tried to include it as [output.lateral.subsurface.to_river] and then q = "q_subtoriver" , but it doesn't work. can you elaborate more? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The following settings should work in the TOML file: [output.lateral.land]
to_river = "q_landtoriver"
[output.lateral.subsurface]
to_river = "q_subtoriver" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm working with a catchment model that has a KGE of 0.7 and generally good performance but tends to underestimate peak flows. I'm puzzled by a discrepancy in flow components: Q_landtoriver is 1.2, Q_subtoriver is 2242.3, and Q_river is 9. Could this suggest a unit/scale issue, or a deeper problem in the model, given its tendency to under-represent peaks? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Please note, that the units are different between |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I expect the underestimation of peak flows (without knowing the actual catchment) is related to model parameters (and not units, these are correct). For example you could check the
soilthickness
map, the thickness could be too large (in some areas) of your catchment. Or check other (sensitive) parameters likef
orksathorfrac
.