You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the Global pooling operation, the roles of two input feature maps are not equivalent. Only given Figure 6 and Figure 7 in the paper, I cannot know which feature map play the role of channel attention. I fail to find any latent rule from your realization. I wonder how do you determine the positions of two feature maps at every Global pooling operation. Did you ask the authors?
Another little question is why you take the mean value in Global pooling operation while it uses max pooling according to the paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your work!
In the Global pooling operation, the roles of two input feature maps are not equivalent. Only given Figure 6 and Figure 7 in the paper, I cannot know which feature map play the role of channel attention. I fail to find any latent rule from your realization. I wonder how do you determine the positions of two feature maps at every Global pooling operation. Did you ask the authors?
Another little question is why you take the mean value in Global pooling operation while it uses max pooling according to the paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: