You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently searches give redundancies in the results which could be prevented if we made "piece" the default search parameter. For example, it will list both the "piece" (which has movements), and each individual movement of that piece as separate (redundant) results. It is duly noted that when the user attempts to "download all" those redundancies ARE removed so that they do not download the redundant files multiple times. However, it is misleading in the search results to say there are 18 results when there may only be three pieces which each have 5 movements. Savvy?
(It is also duly noted that a user can filter results to just "piece" but I'm not sure that would be immediately clear to a new user.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently searches give redundancies in the results which could be prevented if we made "piece" the default search parameter. For example, it will list both the "piece" (which has movements), and each individual movement of that piece as separate (redundant) results. It is duly noted that when the user attempts to "download all" those redundancies ARE removed so that they do not download the redundant files multiple times. However, it is misleading in the search results to say there are 18 results when there may only be three pieces which each have 5 movements. Savvy?
(It is also duly noted that a user can filter results to just "piece" but I'm not sure that would be immediately clear to a new user.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: