Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace ne16np4 grid for WACCM HIST test with ne16np4.pg3 #1038

Closed
ekluzek opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Replace ne16np4 grid for WACCM HIST test with ne16np4.pg3 #1038

ekluzek opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working correctly misc tag issue or PR candidate for upcoming misc tag

Comments

@ekluzek
Copy link

ekluzek commented May 21, 2024

What happened?

The test SMS_D_Ln9.ne16_ne16_mg17.FX2000.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9 fails because of a missing transient dataset for ne16np4, while there is one for ne16np5.pg3.

What are the steps to reproduce the bug?

Run SMS_D_Ln9.ne16_ne16_mg17.FX2000.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9

What CAM tag were you using?

cam6_3_161

What machine were you running CAM on?

CISL machine (e.g. cheyenne)

What compiler were you using?

Intel

Path to a case directory, if applicable

No response

Will you be addressing this bug yourself?

No

Extra info

See the CTSM issue on this:

ESCOMP/CTSM#2547

There it was decided that CAM should address this and change the test to ne30np4.pg3 rather than adding a new dataset in CTSM.

@ekluzek ekluzek added the bug Something isn't working correctly label May 21, 2024
@cacraigucar cacraigucar added the misc tag issue or PR candidate for upcoming misc tag label May 21, 2024
@adamrher
Copy link

adamrher commented May 21, 2024

I just want to double check with @PeterHjortLauritzen here. In the grids doc, we have no land support for ne16np4. I had originally thought that this issue was about missing transient support, but there's actually not even land support for non-transient cases (year 1850, 2000). Are we OK to not support land for ne16np4? We had decided to have some land support (1850, 2000) for ne30np4, but not transient support.

@brian-eaton
Copy link
Collaborator

@fvitt, I just tried running FX2000 on the ne16pg3 grid and got the following error:

set_geogrid: npes,nlon_g,nlat_g:    512   144    96
set_geogrid: ntasks_lon,ntasks_lat (oplus and edyn grids):     16    32
Enter edynamo_init:
Grid: gmag_grid, ID =  111, lat coord  = mlat, lon coord  = mlon, unstruct   =  F, block_ind  =  F, zonal_grid =  F
Grid: geo_grid, ID =  112, lat coord  = glat, lon coord  = glon, unstruct   =  F, block_ind  =  F, zonal_grid =  F
 edyn_gcomp_init: coord mismatch... n, lon(n), lonmesh(n), diff_lon =      1    
 321.5625000000000       354.3750000000000             0.32812D+02
 edyn_gcomp_init: coord mismatch... n, lat(n), latmesh(n), diff_lat =      1    
  28.4630367524489        33.6223637109358             0.51593D+01
...
 edyn_gcomp_init: coord mismatch... n, lon(n), lonmesh(n), diff_lon =     27    
 325.3125000000000       358.4452882373436             0.33133D+02
 edyn_gcomp_init: coord mismatch... n, lat(n), latmesh(n), diff_lat =     27    
  38.5124386385902        37.8100702260748             0.70237D+00
 ERROR: edyn_gcomp_init: physics mesh coords do not match model coords

Can FX2000 be run on a CSLAM grid?

@fvitt
Copy link

fvitt commented Jun 18, 2024

Yes, FX2000 can be run on a CSLAM grid. cam_physics_mesh needs to point to a valid EMSF mesh file for the CSLAM grid. This should work for the ne16pg3 grid:

cam_physics_mesh = '/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/share/meshes/ne16pg3_ESMFmesh_cdf5_c20211018.nc'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working correctly misc tag issue or PR candidate for upcoming misc tag
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants