-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace ne16np4 grid for WACCM HIST test with ne16np4.pg3 #1038
Comments
I just want to double check with @PeterHjortLauritzen here. In the grids doc, we have no land support for ne16np4. I had originally thought that this issue was about missing transient support, but there's actually not even land support for non-transient cases (year 1850, 2000). Are we OK to not support land for ne16np4? We had decided to have some land support (1850, 2000) for ne30np4, but not transient support. |
@fvitt, I just tried running FX2000 on the ne16pg3 grid and got the following error:
Can FX2000 be run on a CSLAM grid? |
Yes, FX2000 can be run on a CSLAM grid.
|
What happened?
The test SMS_D_Ln9.ne16_ne16_mg17.FX2000.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9 fails because of a missing transient dataset for ne16np4, while there is one for ne16np5.pg3.
What are the steps to reproduce the bug?
Run SMS_D_Ln9.ne16_ne16_mg17.FX2000.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9
What CAM tag were you using?
cam6_3_161
What machine were you running CAM on?
CISL machine (e.g. cheyenne)
What compiler were you using?
Intel
Path to a case directory, if applicable
No response
Will you be addressing this bug yourself?
No
Extra info
See the CTSM issue on this:
ESCOMP/CTSM#2547
There it was decided that CAM should address this and change the test to ne30np4.pg3 rather than adding a new dataset in CTSM.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: