Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multi year MODIS LAI stream for CLM5 SP mode #1024

Open
lawrencepj1 opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 15 comments
Open

Multi year MODIS LAI stream for CLM5 SP mode #1024

lawrencepj1 opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 15 comments
Labels
enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability science Enhancement to or bug impacting science

Comments

@lawrencepj1
Copy link

The existing multi year MODIS CLM prescribed LAI is from CLM4 and runs from 2001 to 2013. The default SP MODIS LAI is a monthly climatology from MCD15A2 for the years 2003 - 2015. An updated version of the multi year CLM5 LAI for 2003 - 2020 would be a valuable addition to the CLM5 functionality.

@ekluzek ekluzek added tag: enh - new science next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability labels Jun 10, 2020
@billsacks billsacks removed the next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. label Jun 22, 2020
@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Nov 5, 2020

@lawrencepj1 what's the status of this update?

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Jun 10, 2021

@mvertens and @lawrencepj1 and I talked about this a bit. Mostly in the context of her making sure LAI streams works in NUOPC. But, this new LAI dataset should be done in the new NUOPC setup rather than the MCT framework.

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Jun 17, 2022

Has this been merged into the mksurfdata_esmf work now, or since it's using LAI streams is there a different workflow to create the data? I'm curious about the logistics of running with higher spatial or temporal frequency datasets here?

@wwieder wwieder added this to the ctsm5.2.0 milestone Jun 17, 2022
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Jun 17, 2022

@wwieder since this is an LAI stream it's independent of the ctsm5.2.mksurfdata branch work. And I view that as a benefit of using streams since they can be made independent of the surface dataset. Since the surface dataset involves a whole mix of parts it's a much more complicated and intertwined task. The workflow is we are reliant on the tools that @lawrencepj1 has to create this type of dataset. @lawrencepj1 can you update us on the status of this? I'll also send an email out about it.

@adrifoster
Copy link
Collaborator

@lawrencepj1 I was also wondering about your post-processing for the MODIS LAI product. I have seen some papers that show it is fairly noisy and has some extreme values that warrant correct/post-processing (e.g., Yuan et al. 2011, more recent update)

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Dec 7, 2022

@lawrencepj1 what's the status on this work?

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Dec 7, 2022

Also, removing this from CTSM5.2 project but adding it to CTSM6 highlights.

@wwieder wwieder modified the milestones: ctsm5.2.0, CESM3 Dec 7, 2022
@jkshuman
Copy link
Contributor

jkshuman commented Jan 4, 2023

tagging @katiedagon and asking her to add Daniel Kennedy and Linnia Hawkins to this issue. There is interest in MODIS LAI from the PPE work.

@ekluzek @lawrencepj1 let's talk about this tomorrow. Specifically, what version of MODIS is setting LAI and then being used for SP and what is the most recent reference that can be cited for this data?

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Apr 19, 2023

Given gaps in the data, is this something we think we can realistically deliver, @lawrencepj1 ?

@lawrencepj1
Copy link
Author

Hi @wwieder. It really depends on the timeframe. If it is by the end of this summer then maybe otherwise I would go with no.

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Apr 19, 2023

CESM3 release is scheduled for Fall 2024. Maybe we can discuss Thursday if this is something that's technically realistic and practically achievable.

@lawrencepj1
Copy link
Author

Great that does seem like a more achievable timeframe. In that case I think we would want to have it done this year with supporting code and testing completed by the end of 2023.

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Apr 19, 2023

Thanks, Peter.

FWIW, it seems getting FATES LULCC and wood harvest issues resolved would be a higher priority for dataset contributions, but we should discuss at the CLM meeting.

@lawrencepj1
Copy link
Author

Okay lets talk about priorities and we can make plans around that 😁

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Aug 1, 2023

High @lawrencepj1, I'm trying to check in quarterly on some issues. Is this something that's still on your radar that we should consider supporting for CESM3, or is it unlikely to come it?

@wwieder wwieder moved this to Prep line - not close to the oven in CTSM-CLM6 development highlights Jun 17, 2024
@samsrabin samsrabin added science Enhancement to or bug impacting science and removed enh - new science labels Aug 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability science Enhancement to or bug impacting science
Projects
Status: Prep line - not close to the oven
Development

No branches or pull requests