🐛 mni_icbm152_t1_tal_nlin_asym_09c
vs. tpl-MNI152NLin2009cAsym
#18
Labels
mni_icbm152_t1_tal_nlin_asym_09c
vs. tpl-MNI152NLin2009cAsym
#18
Describe the bug
Both of these templates (
mni_icbm152_t1_tal_nlin_asym_09c.nii
packaged in C-PAC &tpl-MNI152NLin2009cAsym
from TemplateFlow) seem to be templates forspace-MNI152NLin2009cAsym
but they aren't identical.Expected behavior
Templates are identical or have different names
Acceptance criteria
C-PAC version
v1.8.5-dev
Additional context
They both have
b'mnc2nii mni_icbm152_nlin_asym_09c/mni_icbm152_t1_tal_nlin_asym_09c.mnc mni_icbm'
as the description in the header, butmni_icbm152_t1_tal_nlin_asym_09c.nii
haswhere
tpl-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_res-01_T1w.nii.gz
from TemplateFlow hasThey look the same visually,
mni_icbm152_t1_tal_nlin_asym_09c
tpl-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_res-01_T1w
but
get_fdata()
shows roughly a 100× scaling between the data points (like thecal_max
in the headers, although less precisely):Gist with files, headers, and images: https://gist.github.com/shnizzedy/03e8ba5ead9987b5a299e2501ec77ae0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: