You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Using Imagen2's product background generation the product will never be altered, which is very important for my retail usecase. When I follow the example code to create product background images using Imagen3 and "bgswap" I am seeing the product being altered significantly, in that not only is the background being changed but also the foreground product. This is also present in the example image (the suitecase) shared in the docs. Is there a way to leverage the superior image quality of Imagen3 but have the approach of the Imagen2 method which did not ever change the product image?
I have attached an example reference image and outputs from imagen2 and image3 to illustrate my point.
Reference:
Imagen2 output, as you see the product is exactly the same as the reference:
Image3 output, where the product has changed significantly:
Relevant log output
No response
Code of Conduct
I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
File Name
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/generative-ai/blob/main/vision/getting-started/imagen3_editing.ipynb
What happened?
Using Imagen2's product background generation the product will never be altered, which is very important for my retail usecase. When I follow the example code to create product background images using Imagen3 and "bgswap" I am seeing the product being altered significantly, in that not only is the background being changed but also the foreground product. This is also present in the example image (the suitecase) shared in the docs. Is there a way to leverage the superior image quality of Imagen3 but have the approach of the Imagen2 method which did not ever change the product image?
I have attached an example reference image and outputs from imagen2 and image3 to illustrate my point.
Reference:
Imagen2 output, as you see the product is exactly the same as the reference:
Image3 output, where the product has changed significantly:
Relevant log output
No response
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: