You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Disclaimer: I have not read all the narrative documentation, so I might be completely wrong.
According to my undestanding ePI Bundle should be a definitional description of one product.
Bundle, however, allows multiple MedicinalProductDefinitions. Composition allows multiple subjects.
PackagedProductDefinition and AdministrableProductDefinition do not have a mandatory reference to the MedicinalProductDefinition, which makes it very difficult to assemble the correct product information if these references are missing and multiple MedicinalProductDefinitions occur in the Bundle.
Either only one MedicinalProductDefinition and Composition.subject is allowed, or the references from other resources need to be forced as mandatory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Can consider making the references mandatory for Type 2 and Type 3 ePIs. Need to think on this a little further to determine whether it negatively impacts implementation in Jordan, Brazil and APAC.
Disclaimer: I have not read all the narrative documentation, so I might be completely wrong.
According to my undestanding ePI Bundle should be a definitional description of one product.
Bundle, however, allows multiple MedicinalProductDefinitions. Composition allows multiple subjects.
PackagedProductDefinition and AdministrableProductDefinition do not have a mandatory reference to the MedicinalProductDefinition, which makes it very difficult to assemble the correct product information if these references are missing and multiple MedicinalProductDefinitions occur in the Bundle.
Either only one MedicinalProductDefinition and Composition.subject is allowed, or the references from other resources need to be forced as mandatory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: