You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You can use the same strategy of branch and prune. For a function $f: \mathbb{R}^n -> \mathbb{R}$, and a level y
Take an interval box X.
Compute its image f(X) with interval arithmetic.
If f(X) does not contain y, discard X (it is guaranteed no part of the isoline is in X). Otherwise bisect X in two smaller boxes, and go back to 2 with both.
You continue this until you get to boxes that are small enough. The remaining boxes are guaranteed to contain all of the y-isolines.
However, as far as I know, in general it is hard to prove the existence of the isoline in a box. The reason is that by default proving existence and uniqueness is the same, and for an isoline the solution is never unique. I had a trick for something similar in my master thesis, but it was not published and I don't know if there is something similar in the literature.
What @Kolaru describes is what IntervalConstraintProgramming.jl does, although that package it not in a good state right now.
For proving existence / uniqueness of isolines, I believe there are approaches using a parametric version of the interval Newton method, e.g. https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/130906544
I find this package absolutely useful. Any way of using it or similar methods to find, given a function from R^n to R the isolines?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: