We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I have a strange interoperability problem where KDSoap uses different response names as the partner. It seems to boil down to WSDL definitions like:
<operation name='Foo'> <input name='FooRequest' message='FooInput'/> <output name='FooResponse' message='FooOutput'/> </operation> <message name='FooInput'> </message> <message name='FooOutput'> <part name='return' type='xsd:int'/> </message>
KDSoap generates responses like: ... <soap:Body> <FooOutput> <return>0</return> </FooOutput> </soap:Body> ...
... <soap:Body> <FooOutput> <return>0</return> </FooOutput> </soap:Body> ...
Where my communication partner expects: ... <soap:Body> <FooResponse> <return>0</return> </FooResponse> </soap:Body> ..
... <soap:Body> <FooResponse> <return>0</return> </FooResponse> </soap:Body> ..
From my understanding KDSoap is right, but where do I find references in the standard RFCs to prove this?
[edit: probably nowhere, because these definitions have contradicting names?]
Thanks for any help, Uli
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just see that my expamples got severly mangled during post. Will try to fix the post...
Sorry, something went wrong.
Now the vital XML should be readable. If not, please yell at me.
No branches or pull requests
I have a strange interoperability problem where KDSoap uses different response names as the partner.
It seems to boil down to WSDL definitions like:
KDSoap generates responses like:
... <soap:Body> <FooOutput> <return>0</return> </FooOutput> </soap:Body> ...
Where my communication partner expects:
... <soap:Body> <FooResponse> <return>0</return> </FooResponse> </soap:Body> ..
From my understanding KDSoap is right, but where do I find references in the standard RFCs
to prove this?
[edit: probably nowhere, because these definitions have contradicting names?]
Thanks for any help,
Uli
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: