Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BOM consolidation #7

Open
BernhardEllmann opened this issue Jun 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

BOM consolidation #7

BernhardEllmann opened this issue Jun 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@BernhardEllmann
Copy link

BernhardEllmann commented Jun 13, 2020

Why use different types for:

  • C8, C14, C16: 50V
  • C17: 100V
    could 100V type be used for all 4 components?

Why do (C12, C33, C39, C49) resp. C41 show up in different lines?
They seem to have the same parameters

Values for D2, D3 are missing

J3, J4: there are too many options, please specify

@BernhardEllmann BernhardEllmann changed the title BOM consolidation: C8, C14, C16, C34 vs. C17 BOM consolidation Jun 13, 2020
@martinjaeger martinjaeger added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 14, 2020
@martinjaeger
Copy link
Member

Thanks for these enhancements.

  • C17 etc. (10 nF): I agree this makes sense. Will update this.
  • C41 etc. (2.2uF): I forgot to add the part number in the schematic for one of them, so the BOM export puts it in a separate line as their information was not exactly the same. Just added the number also for C41, so it will get to the same line for next export.
  • D2, D3: Oops, forgot to specify as I just took one of the SS14FL. We could actually consolidate the different types of Schottky diodes better and just use 60V / 2A versions everywhere. Suitable parts:
    Nexperia PMEG6020ER,115 or ON Semi NRVTS260ESFT1G
  • J3, J4: Amphenol FCI 54602-908LF (will add it to the BOM aswell)

@BernhardEllmann
Copy link
Author

thanks to your here too !

martinjaeger added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants