Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using calibration video for multiview PCA loss #127

Open
olivier-cuttlefish opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Using calibration video for multiview PCA loss #127

olivier-cuttlefish opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@olivier-cuttlefish
Copy link

olivier-cuttlefish commented Dec 16, 2024

Given that one already have calibration video with checkerboards, one could technically use those points to compute the projection matrix from one view to the other one. I would assume that it would give better results than using labeling data that can be less precise and less good at extrapolating throughout the view (for freely moving animal setups). Do you expect it to substantially improve performance or only anecdotally ? What would be the recommended way to bypass using labeled data and force the lightningpose to use checkerboard data instead ?

@themattinthehatt
Copy link
Collaborator

That's a great suggestion - I do expect that the checkboard data would be very helpful for computing the multiview PCA subspace, especially in the low-label regime.

In the new year we are going to start focusing more of our time on building out features for the multiview case, so this is certainly something we could work on.

If you don't mind me asking, what lab are you from, and what does your setup look like (species, number of cameras, etc.)? As we move forward with providing more support for multiview setups it will be helpful for us to have an idea of who is using lightning pose and on what data.

@themattinthehatt themattinthehatt added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 16, 2024
@olivier-cuttlefish
Copy link
Author

Great to hear that you are planning to add more features! Would that be OK for me to answer you directly by email ?

@themattinthehatt
Copy link
Collaborator

yes definitely - m.whiteway at columbia dot edu

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants