You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi there, is there recommended way to define a combination of MARCspecs to indicate multiple applicable matches? Solrmarc and Traject both use a colon to delimit multiple specs.
Examples:
If I wanted to refer to both fields 506 and 540, it would be nice to be able to do something like 506:540.
A slightly more complex example, using subSpecs: 650$z:650$a:034{LDR/6=\e}:255{LDR/6=\e}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! I'm not sure if this should be described by the spec or leave it to the application. I mean why determine such a delimiter and not leave it to the flavor of the application (colon, pipe, whitespace are all possible). On the other hand there may be some use cases for exchanging such combinations. So why not if this is a real requirement. Are you planing to implement MARCspec?
Yes, we are considering building a MARCspec implementation, perhaps based upon Traject and ruby-marc. I'd also be interested in perhaps contributing a Python implementation.
Hi there, is there recommended way to define a combination of MARCspecs to indicate multiple applicable matches? Solrmarc and Traject both use a colon to delimit multiple specs.
Examples:
506
and540
, it would be nice to be able to do something like506:540
.650$z:650$a:034{LDR/6=\e}:255{LDR/6=\e}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: