New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Pulse rate vs average K vs attack rate #8

Open

gabrielgellner opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 0 comments

Assignees

Contributor

gabrielgellner commented May 27, 2020

Discussion with Kevin for @gabrielgellner to think about:

Winder if you simply show a rapid pulse and it's omnivory response under passive and density dependent preference as a "purely bottom-up" driven dynamic omnivory case that can occur very naturally (eg passive no behavior even works).

And then do a no pulse under 3 K_ave and run a long run in each case and measure long term ave omnivory and top heaviness to show this is definitely driven to some extents by cascading top down influence.

Actually latter one just increase attack rates between C and R and P and C and so no bottom up signal at all. And for latter could do CV.

The problem with K is it is both bottom and top down so interaction strength cleaner.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

gabrielgellner self-assigned this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment