You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 27, 2022. It is now read-only.
Using the abstract solver interface as defined in DifferentialEquations.jl would make it possible to use different solvers in the future. In particular the option to use solvers written in Julia that support all Julia data types would create new possibilities.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Nice, but I think having an issue for it is a good place to discuss the approach and the progress. To implement this, the main place to make changes is simulate.jl. Is that correct? If the needed changes are implemented here, would it also be needed to modify Modia.jl?
And which tests must be passed for the new implementation to make sure it is functional equivalent?
Using the abstract solver interface as defined in DifferentialEquations.jl would make it possible to use different solvers in the future. In particular the option to use solvers written in Julia that support all Julia data types would create new possibilities.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: