Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 9, 2022. It is now read-only.

Consider naming metapackages by acronym instead of sector. #495

Open
danielballan opened this issue Jan 4, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Consider naming metapackages by acronym instead of sector. #495

danielballan opened this issue Jan 4, 2019 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@danielballan
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

I think we should remove the sector numbers from DAMA related things because we want to track things to the science program, not to the physical location.

If the beamline were to move sectors (seem unlikely..) we would want the software environments to follow the program and if a sector has a new science program put in place (and gets a new acronym) we will want to have new environments for the new science program while still maintaining the analysis environments from the old science program.

@mrakitin mrakitin added this to the 19 cycle 3 milestone Mar 15, 2019
@mrakitin mrakitin modified the milestones: 19 cycle 3, Undefined Sep 22, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants