You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed a slight license discrepancy in this repo. The LICENSE.md file states that the source is licensed under CERN-OHL-S but the license file found in the repo is cern_ohl_w_v2.txt which describes CERN-OHL-W. Could you fix the included license file to make the applicable license more unambiguous? (Or the LICENSE.md file if you intended to use CERN-OHL-W.)
Additionally, in LICENSE.md, I assume the last two (or three?) paragraphs are "Notices" as defined by CERN-OHL-x. To make it less ambiguous, could I request you add a "Notices" subheading in that file to indicate that and to peg that file as the expected location for notices of any derived works?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I noticed a slight license discrepancy in this repo. The LICENSE.md file states that the source is licensed under CERN-OHL-S but the license file found in the repo is cern_ohl_w_v2.txt which describes CERN-OHL-W. Could you fix the included license file to make the applicable license more unambiguous? (Or the LICENSE.md file if you intended to use CERN-OHL-W.)
Additionally, in LICENSE.md, I assume the last two (or three?) paragraphs are "Notices" as defined by CERN-OHL-x. To make it less ambiguous, could I request you add a "Notices" subheading in that file to indicate that and to peg that file as the expected location for notices of any derived works?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: