Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"getAll" in list function is not implemented on Threat Actors. #758

Open
Lhorus6 opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

"getAll" in list function is not implemented on Threat Actors. #758

Lhorus6 opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug use for describing something not working as expected
Milestone

Comments

@Lhorus6
Copy link

Lhorus6 commented Oct 29, 2024

Description

The threat actor (the base class, the individual and group) has a function for list. One of the kwarg args is getAll.

In other SDO classes when you set this to true it sets the page to 100 (see here) and performs pagination (see here). In the threat actor, it sets the first to 500 (see here) and ignores any actor after that (no "while" loop to paginate).

Environment

OCTI 6.3.7

Reproducible Steps

Steps to create the smallest reproducible scenario:

  1. Use the "list" function of the threat actor and the report class, both with getAll at true.
@Lhorus6 Lhorus6 added bug use for describing something not working as expected needs triage use to identify issue needing triage from Filigran Product team labels Oct 29, 2024
@Lhorus6 Lhorus6 changed the title "get_all" in list function is not implemented on Threat Actors. "getAll" in list function is not implemented on Threat Actors. Oct 29, 2024
@romain-filigran romain-filigran added this to the Bugs Backlog milestone Nov 5, 2024
@nino-filigran nino-filigran removed the needs triage use to identify issue needing triage from Filigran Product team label Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug use for describing something not working as expected
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants