Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Conform to the Provisioned Service ducktype defined in the Service Binding Specification for Kubernetes #120

Open
baijum opened this issue Feb 15, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #232
Open

Conform to the Provisioned Service ducktype defined in the Service Binding Specification for Kubernetes #120

baijum opened this issue Feb 15, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #232
Assignees
@xieshenzh
Labels
hold

Comments

@baijum
Copy link
Contributor

baijum commented Feb 15, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Ref. https://github.com/servicebinding/spec#provisioned-service

Here is an example from another operator: https://github.com/rabbitmq/cluster-operator/blob/f79f2a571077a89e47f6e8350a7adc4586138848/api/v1beta1/rabbitmqcluster_status.go#L20

The current annotation-based approach is supported in SBO. But SBO encourages every service provider to follow the core spec recommended Provisioned Service based approach.
@baijum
Copy link
Contributor Author

baijum commented Mar 1, 2022

I am working on a PR to document Provisioned Service for backing service providers. This will be available from the https://servicebinding.io website.

@jeremyary
Copy link
Contributor

Hold for beta [R3] planning/evaluation. Thanks Baiju, we'll TAL soon.

@jeremyary jeremyary added the hold label Mar 7, 2022
@baijum
Copy link
Contributor Author

baijum commented Jul 25, 2022

@jeremyary Any update about this issue?

@xieshenzh xieshenzh self-assigned this Aug 30, 2022
@xieshenzh xieshenzh linked a pull request Sep 13, 2022 that will close this issue
DBAAS-831: update DBaaSConnection status to conform to the Provisioned Service ducktype defined in the Service Binding Specification for Kubernetes #232
Open
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@xieshenzh xieshenzh

Labels
hold
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
3 participants
@baijum @jeremyary @xieshenzh