Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is continuity information in the normalized Patent Object Model? #109

Open
mikessut opened this issue Apr 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Is continuity information in the normalized Patent Object Model? #109

mikessut opened this issue Apr 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@mikessut
Copy link

mikessut commented Apr 2, 2020

It is my understanding that continuity information is contained within the bulk files for applications. Does this information make it into the normalized Patent Object Model?

@bgfeldm
Copy link
Contributor

bgfeldm commented Apr 2, 2020

Yes, within the Redbook us-related-documents, PAP continuity-data and SGML B600 are parsed and stored as relationIds, which also holds other related ids (regional and national filing ids), they can be retrieved with Patent getRelationIds(). For each DocumentId use getType() to return the DocumentIdType, such as ADDITION, DIVISION, CONTINUATION, and CONTINUATION_IN_PART.

@mikessut
Copy link
Author

mikessut commented Apr 2, 2020

Thank you. Very helpful.

Does it make sense to output the types for the reatedIds in the json serializer? Something like what I've done here?
https://github.com/mikessut/PatentPublicData/tree/mikessut/continuity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants