Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
51 lines (23 loc) · 2.4 KB

API Gateway.md

File metadata and controls

51 lines (23 loc) · 2.4 KB

API Gateway Pattern

1. Context

In a microservices architecture, clients usually have to interact with multiple, disparate services to accomplish a task. These services might use different data formats, protocols, and may require different types of authentication and authorization.

2. Problem

Directly interacting with each microservice poses several challenges:

  • Clients need to manage multiple endpoints, which can get complex and cumbersome.

  • Each service might require different types of authentication.

  • Diverse data formats and protocols make it difficult to have a unified client interface.

  • Network latency can increase if a single task requires multiple service calls.

3. Solution

The API Gateway pattern introduces a single entry point that routes client requests to the appropriate microservices. It can handle tasks like request routing, composition, and protocol translation. The API Gateway may also aggregate data from multiple services and deliver it to the client in a single response. Moreover, it can centralize cross-cutting concerns like authentication, logging, and SSL termination.

4. Benefits

  • Simplified Client: With only one endpoint to manage, client-side logic becomes simpler.

  • Cross-Cutting Concerns: Centralizing authentication, logging, etc., keeps services focused on business logic.

  • Optimized Network Traffic: By aggregating multiple requests, the API Gateway can reduce the number of round-trips between the client and server.

  • Protocol Translation: It can translate between different web service protocols and data formats, making it easier to integrate different types of services.

5. Drawbacks

  • Single Point of Failure: If the API Gateway is down, all routes to services are blocked.

  • Increased Latency: Adding an extra layer in the network route can introduce additional latency.

  • Complexity: As the gateway accumulates features, it can become a development and operational bottleneck.

6. Alternative Solutions

  • Direct Client-to-Microservice Communication: This bypasses the need for an API Gateway but introduces complexity in the client and doesn't address cross-cutting concerns.

  • Service Mesh: More decentralized than an API Gateway, a service mesh handles inter-service communication, freeing services from that responsibility. However, it introduces its own complexities and is often overkill for simpler setups.