-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explain why associating bugs failed #710
Comments
Hello @marusak, I am very much curious to understand this issue. Regarding this issue, When I click on
I thought if I can read the error trace, I can understand something more. I tried the following, In the docker folder, For the other error, After searching in many places, I could see the same error messages in the end of the With my little above understanding, if you can please direct and connect me with this issue, I will be so glad to take it up. |
Ok, sorry for delayed answer. I looked at it yesterday and I was surprised with the behavior, which was as you wrote, but different from what I thought it should be. To see this issue pick either When you try to pull random bug from bugzillas, you only get |
Thanks @marusak . At this point, looks like the Can you please tell me where to find our print lines and debug logs in the container? It shall help me play with it and understand it better. I am willing to work on and submit a PR for this issue. Shall I ? |
Yeah, I think you are right. We should probably raise exception or return error information (maybe as tuple?), why the function
by Line 28 in 2976d8a
When I want to see outputs from somewhere I just raise it, such as
definitely |
When a report needs to be associated with a bug, failure happens sometimes. The failure message is very generic making it difficult for the user to understand the problem. Now on failures, raised exception will contain appropriate message that will be flashed in the web page helping the user. Resolves: abrt#710 Signed-off-by: Gayathri Rajendar <gayathriirajendar@gmail.com>
Previously, on error in fetching the bug, it is returned as None and the error was not sent upstream but only logged in the server. We now expect an error instead of None on failures. Related: abrt#710 Signed-off-by: Gayathri Rajendar <gayathriirajendar@gmail.com>
Previously, on error while fetching a bug, it is returned as None and the error was not sent upstream but only logged in the server. We now expect an error instead of None on failures. Related: abrt#710 Signed-off-by: Gayathri Rajendar <gayathriirajendar@gmail.com>
When a report needs to be associated with a bug, failure happens sometimes. The failure message is very generic making it difficult for the user to understand the problem. Now on failures, raised exception will contain appropriate message that will be flashed in the web page helping the user. Resolves: #710 Signed-off-by: Gayathri Rajendar <gayathriirajendar@gmail.com>
Previously, on error while fetching a bug, it is returned as None and the error was not sent upstream but only logged in the server. We now expect an error instead of None on failures. Related: #710 Signed-off-by: Gayathri Rajendar <gayathriirajendar@gmail.com>
If I use web UI to associate bug to a report often it happens that it is rejected but only a generic message is displayed. It is frustrating to use. Often the reason is different opsys, different components etc.
Lets show this information to user so it easier to understand what is happening.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: