You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After figuring out that video sequences 1080@15p have a very good reconstruction percentage I wonder if this could be a first thing for everyone. For me I recorded 60 seconds of video, by walking around a statue and created 75 high res (16MP) photo's afterwards.
The photo's can do 66/75, 18k points. The movie+photo's (and some quality impromevents) do 100k points for 705 photo's, all image in the image sequence can be located. I think the documentation should suggest this workflow, but might also suggest what kind of settings for featurematching should be set up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I also use this workflow with ok results. I used ffmpeg to split but the files but am now looking at importing the videos directly as it looks like that does now work. However with video i'm not sure if exposure and focus are in the metadata? I thought that was the advantage of photos?
After figuring out that video sequences 1080@15p have a very good reconstruction percentage I wonder if this could be a first thing for everyone. For me I recorded 60 seconds of video, by walking around a statue and created 75 high res (16MP) photo's afterwards.
The photo's can do 66/75, 18k points. The movie+photo's (and some quality impromevents) do 100k points for 705 photo's, all image in the image sequence can be located. I think the documentation should suggest this workflow, but might also suggest what kind of settings for featurematching should be set up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: