Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IDE 2.0: Selecting/changing a board is a pain #2070

Closed
3 tasks done
rs0xFFFF opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
3 tasks done

IDE 2.0: Selecting/changing a board is a pain #2070

rs0xFFFF opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
conclusion: duplicate Has already been submitted topic: code Related to content of the project itself type: enhancement Proposed improvement

Comments

@rs0xFFFF
Copy link

rs0xFFFF commented May 18, 2023

Describe the problem

Selecting/changing a board via the Tools->Board:... menu is 5x faster than via the combo box on the toolbar. The board and port settings are always lost. You have to spend a lot of time looking for the board every time.

To reproduce

n/a

Expected behavior

Provide a combobox with drop down list (history list) of last used boards inclusive ports.

Arduino IDE version

2.0.4

Operating system

Windows

Operating system version

Win10

Additional context

No response

Issue checklist

  • I searched for previous reports in the issue tracker
  • I verified the problem still occurs when using the latest nightly build
  • My report contains all necessary details
@rs0xFFFF rs0xFFFF added the type: imperfection Perceived defect in any part of project label May 18, 2023
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this May 22, 2023
@per1234
Copy link
Contributor

per1234 commented May 22, 2023

Hi @rs0xFFFF. Thanks for your suggestion. I see we have previous feature requests about this here:

It is best to have only a single issue per subject so we can consolidate all relevant discussion to one place, so I'll go ahead and close this in favor of the others.

If you end up with additional information to share, feel free to comment in the relevant previous thread.

@per1234 per1234 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 22, 2023
@per1234 per1234 added conclusion: duplicate Has already been submitted type: enhancement Proposed improvement topic: code Related to content of the project itself and removed type: imperfection Perceived defect in any part of project labels May 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
conclusion: duplicate Has already been submitted topic: code Related to content of the project itself type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants