Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Missing methods to generate a device ID from hardware info #119

Open
sorru94 opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Missing methods to generate a device ID from hardware info #119

sorru94 opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request tracking Traking issue, should be re-evaluated periodically
Milestone
v0.8

Comments

@sorru94
Copy link
Collaborator

sorru94 commented May 2, 2024

Furthermore, evaluate if CONFIG_ASTARTE_DEVICE_SDK_GENERATE_DEVICE_ID is necessary.
@sorru94 sorru94 added this to the v0.6 milestone May 2, 2024
@sorru94 sorru94 added enhancement New feature or request discussion Open discussion labels May 2, 2024
@sorru94
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sorru94 commented May 9, 2024

This could be addressed once Zephyr 3.7.0 has been released using hwinfo_get_device_eui64.

@sorru94 sorru94 modified the milestones: v0.6, v0.7 May 9, 2024
@sorru94
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sorru94 commented Jul 17, 2024

Providing an utility to generate an hardware ID starting from hardware info will have to wait until more Zephyr boards implement the hwinfo_get_device_eui64 function.
This issue should be postponed until then.

@sorru94 sorru94 added tracking Traking issue, should be re-evaluated periodically and removed discussion Open discussion labels Jul 17, 2024
@sorru94 sorru94 modified the milestones: v0.7, v0.8 Jul 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request tracking Traking issue, should be re-evaluated periodically
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.8
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@sorru94