comments | difficulty | edit_url | rating | source | tags | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
true |
Easy |
1257 |
Weekly Contest 341 Q2 |
|
You are given two integer arrays nums
and divisors
.
The divisibility score of divisors[i]
is the number of indices j
such that nums[j]
is divisible by divisors[i]
.
Return the integer divisors[i]
with the maximum divisibility score. If multiple integers have the maximum score, return the smallest one.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [2,9,15,50], divisors = [5,3,7,2]
Output: 2
Explanation:
The divisibility score of divisors[0]
is 2 since nums[2]
and nums[3]
are divisible by 5.
The divisibility score of divisors[1]
is 2 since nums[1]
and nums[2]
are divisible by 3.
The divisibility score of divisors[2]
is 0 since none of the numbers in nums
is divisible by 7.
The divisibility score of divisors[3]
is 2 since nums[0]
and nums[3]
are divisible by 2.
As divisors[0]
, divisors[1]
, and divisors[3]
have the same divisibility score, we return the smaller one which is divisors[3]
.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [4,7,9,3,9], divisors = [5,2,3]
Output: 3
Explanation:
The divisibility score of divisors[0]
is 0 since none of numbers in nums
is divisible by 5.
The divisibility score of divisors[1]
is 1 since only nums[0]
is divisible by 2.
The divisibility score of divisors[2]
is 3 since nums[2]
, nums[3]
and nums[4]
are divisible by 3.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [20,14,21,10], divisors = [10,16,20]
Output: 10
Explanation:
The divisibility score of divisors[0]
is 2 since nums[0]
and nums[3]
are divisible by 10.
The divisibility score of divisors[1]
is 0 since none of the numbers in nums
is divisible by 16.
The divisibility score of divisors[2]
is 1 since nums[0]
is divisible by 20.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length, divisors.length <= 1000
1 <= nums[i], divisors[i] <= 109
We can enumerate each element
- If
$cnt$ is greater than the current maximum divisibility score$mx$ , then update$mx = cnt$ , and update$ans = div$ . - If
$cnt$ equals$mx$ and$div$ is less than$ans$ , then update$ans = div$ .
Finally, return
The time complexity is
class Solution:
def maxDivScore(self, nums: List[int], divisors: List[int]) -> int:
ans, mx = divisors[0], 0
for div in divisors:
cnt = sum(x % div == 0 for x in nums)
if mx < cnt:
mx, ans = cnt, div
elif mx == cnt and ans > div:
ans = div
return ans
class Solution {
public int maxDivScore(int[] nums, int[] divisors) {
int ans = divisors[0];
int mx = 0;
for (int div : divisors) {
int cnt = 0;
for (int x : nums) {
if (x % div == 0) {
++cnt;
}
}
if (mx < cnt) {
mx = cnt;
ans = div;
} else if (mx == cnt) {
ans = Math.min(ans, div);
}
}
return ans;
}
}
class Solution {
public:
int maxDivScore(vector<int>& nums, vector<int>& divisors) {
int ans = divisors[0];
int mx = 0;
for (int div : divisors) {
int cnt = 0;
for (int x : nums) {
cnt += x % div == 0;
}
if (mx < cnt) {
mx = cnt;
ans = div;
} else if (mx == cnt) {
ans = min(ans, div);
}
}
return ans;
}
};
func maxDivScore(nums []int, divisors []int) int {
ans, mx := divisors[0], 0
for _, div := range divisors {
cnt := 0
for _, x := range nums {
if x%div == 0 {
cnt++
}
}
if mx < cnt {
ans, mx = div, cnt
} else if mx == cnt && ans > div {
ans = div
}
}
return ans
}
function maxDivScore(nums: number[], divisors: number[]): number {
let ans: number = divisors[0];
let mx: number = 0;
for (const div of divisors) {
const cnt = nums.reduce((a, b) => a + (b % div == 0 ? 1 : 0), 0);
if (mx < cnt) {
mx = cnt;
ans = div;
} else if (mx === cnt && ans > div) {
ans = div;
}
}
return ans;
}
impl Solution {
pub fn max_div_score(nums: Vec<i32>, divisors: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let mut ans = divisors[0];
let mut mx = 0;
for &div in &divisors {
let mut cnt = 0;
for &n in &nums {
if n % div == 0 {
cnt += 1;
}
}
if cnt > mx || (cnt >= mx && div < ans) {
mx = cnt;
ans = div;
}
}
ans
}
}