We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Distribute the C++ SDK under two liberal licenses.
s3fs is licensed as a GPLv2 or later program. GPLv2 is not compatible with Apache v2 and thus the license effectively upgrades to GPLv3 or later.
Dual license the SDK like Rust does:
https://www.rust-lang.org/policies/licenses
Some discussion about Apache and GPL licenses:
https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
Further StackOverflow discussion which states and incompatibility with GPLv2:
https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/1357/can-i-link-a-apache-2-0-library-into-software-under-gplv2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for this suggestion, we are looking into this. I will make sure to include any updates here.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Describe the feature
Distribute the C++ SDK under two liberal licenses.
Use Case
s3fs is licensed as a GPLv2 or later program. GPLv2 is not compatible with Apache v2 and thus the license effectively upgrades to GPLv3 or later.
Proposed Solution
Dual license the SDK like Rust does:
https://www.rust-lang.org/policies/licenses
Other Information
Some discussion about Apache and GPL licenses:
https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
Further StackOverflow discussion which states and incompatibility with GPLv2:
https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/1357/can-i-link-a-apache-2-0-library-into-software-under-gplv2
Acknowledgements
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: