You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We received some feedback that the plot editor is overly complicated. We could remove a few functionalities, and focus on what users really need. Maybe a tutorial on how to use the editor would also make sense.
Summary of challenges:
Identify what functionalities users need and are not available, e.g. color plotted points by phenotype (covariate)
Reduce complexity of the editor
Tutorial on how to use the editor
Axel:
While the ability to edit some figures is welcome, I find the editing menus non-intuitive and also hard to navigate. I could change the colours of texts and axes, but not of the actual sample dots in a tSNE map under dataview, for example. SO while it looks potentially cool, it is actually a pretty useless feature if I cannot change the most important aspect of a plot.
Also, the only plots customers repeatedly asked to be customisable (volcano and MA plots in pairwise DEG) are not editable. I realise that the editor may work on an individual gene (dot) basis, but customers have been asking to, say, colour significantly upregulated genes in red and significantly downregulated ones in blue. That may require a different approach than the plotly editor currently implemented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I took a look at the editor and can clearly identify parts that should be removed:
The entire "Structure" menu. This functionality is not very relevant for us... users should never need to alter the structure of the plot (e.g., change a bar plot to a scatter plot). Anyone advanced enough to do that would just download the plot data and make their own plots.
The "Traces" submenu within the "Style" menu. This functionality is difficult to understand and does not seem to add much.
Removing those two things greatly simplifies the editor. Then the result will be two submenus (Style and Annotate) with three submenus each. In the style menu, users can change the colors, axis labels, title, etc. In the annotate menu, users can draw lines and add extra text. These are the two main things people want to do.
We received some feedback that the plot editor is overly complicated. We could remove a few functionalities, and focus on what users really need. Maybe a tutorial on how to use the editor would also make sense.
Summary of challenges:
Axel:
While the ability to edit some figures is welcome, I find the editing menus non-intuitive and also hard to navigate. I could change the colours of texts and axes, but not of the actual sample dots in a tSNE map under dataview, for example. SO while it looks potentially cool, it is actually a pretty useless feature if I cannot change the most important aspect of a plot.
Also, the only plots customers repeatedly asked to be customisable (volcano and MA plots in pairwise DEG) are not editable. I realise that the editor may work on an individual gene (dot) basis, but customers have been asking to, say, colour significantly upregulated genes in red and significantly downregulated ones in blue. That may require a different approach than the plotly editor currently implemented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: