You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would recommend Haskell's == as an example of equal-always (I think SML's (=) too but I'm not an SML programmer):
ghci> x <- newIORef 3
ghci> y <- newIORef 3
ghci> x == y
False
A minor thing, but I have had a tricky bug in the past from using OCaml's (=) and thinking it was like Haskell's (==), so when I saw the table I thought I'd report it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi all! I'd submit a PR but I can't find the source for the docs. On the page equality, the table says that
equal-always
is like OCaml's(=)
.However, OCaml's
(=)
implementsequal-now
:I would recommend Haskell's
==
as an example ofequal-always
(I think SML's(=)
too but I'm not an SML programmer):A minor thing, but I have had a tricky bug in the past from using OCaml's
(=)
and thinking it was like Haskell's(==)
, so when I saw the table I thought I'd report it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: