Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parsed to CNV endpoints do not cover all ambiguous ranges #465

Open
korikuzma opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Parsed to CNV endpoints do not cover all ambiguous ranges #465

korikuzma opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working priority:low Low priority

Comments

@korikuzma
Copy link
Member

korikuzma commented Jul 13, 2023

We currently only support the form (?_#)_(#_?), but should also provide support for (#_?)_(?_#) and others

@korikuzma korikuzma added bug Something isn't working priority:low Low priority labels Jul 13, 2023
korikuzma added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2023
Close #450 , #458 , #465 , #444

Notes:
- feat: add parsed to copy number change endpoint (#453)
- fix!: /parsed_to_cn_var should accept number, definite range, and indefinite range (#455)
- feat: add do_liftover param in parsed to copy number endpoints (#459)
- refactor!: parsed to copy number should accept request body (#460)
- fix: Copy Number Count copies should be Number or Indef/Def Range (#468)
- fix: allow comparator to be set in start/end values (#469)
korikuzma added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2023
Close #450 , #458 , #465 , #444

Notes:
- feat: add parsed to copy number change endpoint (#453)
- fix!: /parsed_to_cn_var should accept number, definite range, and indefinite range (#455)
- feat: add do_liftover param in parsed to copy number endpoints (#459)
- refactor!: parsed to copy number should accept request body (#460)
- fix: Copy Number Count copies should be Number or Indef/Def Range (#468)
- fix: allow comparator to be set in start/end values (#469)
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

This issue is stale because it has been open 180 days with no activity. This issue will be closed if no further activity occurs in 14 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jan 9, 2025
@korikuzma korikuzma removed the stale label Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working priority:low Low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant