Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve topology inconsistencies #109

Open
jmertic opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Resolve topology inconsistencies #109

jmertic opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jmertic
Copy link
Contributor

jmertic commented Jun 3, 2024

Topology: This is currently inconsistent.

-How many levels of nesting should we allow up and down?
-Should we allow nesting for regions over?
-André and I propose forcing one level up and down and over
-Add a whole system map?

@jmertic
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmertic commented Jun 3, 2024

@Henry-WattTime Feedback on /power-system-resource/{id}/topology

  • Number of levels over?
  • We are treating connected PSRs differently
  • Henry & Andre suggest restricting all up/down/over for simplicity
  • Henry suggest adding a /power-system-resource/topology endpoint that describes the whole system

@jmertic
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmertic commented Jun 3, 2024

Additional questions from @Henry-WattTime

Transmission:

  • how is transmission discoverable?
  • How should it be defined? Is it different than a PSR?
  • can it be combined with the topology list? or discoverable from the topology list?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants