Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Placeholder] Lightclients as implementations using x/accounts #7768

Open
4 tasks
damiannolan opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
4 tasks

[Placeholder] Lightclients as implementations using x/accounts #7768

damiannolan opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
icebox Issues that we will not address for the time being needs discussion Issues that need discussion before they can be worked on needs investigation Issues that need some research before deciding approach or feasibility type: refactor Architecture, code or CI improvements that may or may not tackle technical debt.

Comments

@damiannolan
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Placeholder issue for migration of light client modules to implementations of the new cosmos-sdk module: x/accounts
See: https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/tree/main/x/accounts

A deep dive should be conducted on x/accounts and how it could be integrated with ibc as a means for light client state verification and updates.

For Admin Use

  • Not duplicate issue
  • Appropriate labels applied
  • Appropriate contributors tagged/assigned
  • Estimate provided
@damiannolan damiannolan added icebox Issues that we will not address for the time being needs discussion Issues that need discussion before they can be worked on needs investigation Issues that need some research before deciding approach or feasibility type: refactor Architecture, code or CI improvements that may or may not tackle technical debt. labels Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
icebox Issues that we will not address for the time being needs discussion Issues that need discussion before they can be worked on needs investigation Issues that need some research before deciding approach or feasibility type: refactor Architecture, code or CI improvements that may or may not tackle technical debt.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@damiannolan