We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This issue has been split from #480 (Features missing for Boost.URL) as it turned out to be more complex than we initially thought.
Some functions are not being included in the reference. For instance, https://github.com/boostorg/url/blob/cf2a888c42dedc25f8223dc61d4707e83bd7a22b/include/boost/url/format.hpp#L92 / https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_83_0/libs/url/doc/html/url/ref/boost__urls__format.html. I would guess the reason is that format.hpp doesn't have a corresponding format.cpp file so it's not instantiated when we build Boost.URL without the tests (building with the tests ends up including a lot of junk in the documentation).
See solution #584
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixed in Boost.URL
Sorry, something went wrong.
alandefreitas
No branches or pull requests
This issue has been split from #480 (Features missing for Boost.URL) as it turned out to be more complex than we initially thought.
Some functions are not being included in the reference. For instance, https://github.com/boostorg/url/blob/cf2a888c42dedc25f8223dc61d4707e83bd7a22b/include/boost/url/format.hpp#L92 / https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_83_0/libs/url/doc/html/url/ref/boost__urls__format.html. I would guess the reason is that format.hpp doesn't have a corresponding format.cpp file so it's not instantiated when we build Boost.URL without the tests (building with the tests ends up including a lot of junk in the documentation).
See solution #584
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: