New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Plugin Support #34

Open

cretz opened this issue Sep 12, 2017 · 1 comment

Labels

Owner

cretz commented Sep 12, 2017

This issue is kinda a catch-all for plugins. Some quick thoughts:

Need a more stable ABI before exposing or we need to only expose certain pieces
Essentially a DLL that can use all the Qt it wants
There is no plugin store or plugin vetting process, if you use a plugin you are basically giving the plugin dev full rights over everything. We don't have the bandwidth to be the jury here.
Would of course need a plugin init that does version check and what not
Not to be confused with extensions

cretz added the enhancement label

travisfont commented Sep 26, 2017

This is a huge enhancement and it's what separates the user from fully using Doogie over Chrome.

travisfont mentioned this issue

Extension Support #35

Open

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment