Update to current LTS Version

[SvenLie]

Hey,

Is it possible to update your image to 3.22.15 LTS and tag it as latest or provide a way to use the new version 4?

Thank you

[crramirez]

Hello,

"Is it possible to update your image to 3.22.15 LTS". Yes, give me until the weekend.

And about LimeSurvey 4 I am working on that. Limesurvey 4 requires PHP 7 and it takes some work to build the container with this.

Regards,
Carlos

[stefangweichinger]

Anything I can do to help with LS-4.x?

[stefangweichinger]

Trying to come up with a Dockerfile. To me it seems that the image you use (tutum/lamp) does not really work well when someone wants to install and use PHP7, right?

I'd prefer debian:buster or php:7.4.0-apache but these don't bring mariadb/mysql.

Do you have any ideas or drafts already?

[crramirez]

Hello @stefangweichinger ,

Sorry for not answering before, I was looking for time. Please check this:

https://github.com/crramirez/lamp

and this:

https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/crramirez/lamp

You can rebase the Dockerfile from tutum/lamp to crramirez/lamp. Last time I tried the app didn't start, but this is in what I've been working.

[crramirez]

"I'd prefer debian:buster or php:7.4.0-apache but these don't bring mariadb/mysql." I agree. And I always end with two containers, and the majority are fine with just one container with everything, this is why I stick with the lamp

[stefangweichinger]

The docker philosopy says "one container per service" ;-)
I test with another lamp-image now.
Personally I could live with a docker-compose stack of one app-container with PHP7-FPM and the app, and a 2nd container with mariadb.

[crramirez]

We maybe this is the way now and I can make a script to migrate users from the old container to the newer, but they will have to learn docker-compose. There are other LimeSurvey containers with this split approach. If I separate the containers it is not clear for me which could be the differentiator from other containers.

[stefangweichinger]

What about this image as a base:

https://hub.docker.com/r/mattrayner/lamp

?

[crramirez]

Looks good

[stefangweichinger]

I have a very raw draft of a Dockerfile that prepares the git-tag checkout from upstream in an intermediate container.
The second container is based on above image and so far I only unpack the code etc
This is raw and not yet ready for a PR. But you might be faster in seeing which steps of your v3-Dockerfile are still necessary and which not. Interest?

[crramirez]

Yes,

You can create a draft PR

Thank you

[stefangweichinger]

see #41