Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support different architectures #4

Open
5 tasks
zen0bit opened this issue Feb 4, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
5 tasks

Support different architectures #4

zen0bit opened this issue Feb 4, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@zen0bit
Copy link

zen0bit commented Feb 4, 2024

Since refactoring it could be nice to count with support for different architectures.
Here is first PR..
quickget arm64 support

  • support aarch64 on x86_64
  • support run on arch64
  • support Risc V on x86_64
  • support run on Risc V
  • any other

PS: This will need a more people involved (Can't do it myself)
PPS: I have RPi4 for test
PPPS: Wanna buy Risc V platform, so for test first how is software prepared in quickemu would be awesome

@dabrown645
Copy link
Owner

This is more appropriate when quickemu supports different architectures.

@zen0bit
Copy link
Author

zen0bit commented Feb 6, 2024

Sure i hope we can do it for both quickget and quickemu also

@lj3954
Copy link

lj3954 commented Feb 7, 2024

Sure i hope we can do it for both quickget and quickemu also

Quickget won't be ready to implement architectures for a while, with the complete rewrites both me and @dabrown645 are currently working on. If possible, please work on support for other architectures in quickemu using the few distros in that draft PR. Quickemu will likely take much longer than quickget, the work needs to be started as soon as possible.

@TuxVinyards
Copy link

@zen0bit just to let you know that the new qqX release, out shortly, NOW 🚀 supports RiscV etc

I have tested openSUSE Risc-V as up and working. It's not all automated out of the box (yet?) but proof of concept is now in place.

I am also working on a few other things too, like fixing all the problems with @lj3954 's Sonoma PR, my comments to which he continues to ignore ...

I want to get all your 'new year release' integrated too. But the as the target keeps moving, and even more now with @dabrown645 ' s refactor this might be trickier. I have some ideas though. More later.

I hope my refactor and line space reduction, in lieu of your qqX PR, is a move forward for you, BTW.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants