Skip to content

ZIP packaging comparison

Matt Garrish edited this page Apr 9, 2024 · 4 revisions

Scenario 1 : Standard EPUB

Summary

  • Packaging: EPUB container (ZIP with file rules)
  • ZIP complexity: High
  • Extension: .epub
  • Supported by EPUB reading systems and eBraille reading systems
  • Unzippable for browser reading

Scenario 2 : EPUB with custom extension

Summary

  • Packaging: EPUB container (ZIP with file rules)
  • ZIP complexity: High
  • Extension (example): .ebrl
  • Supported by eBraille reading systems. If extension changed, also by EPUB reading systems.
  • Unzippable for browser reading

Scenario 3 : ZIP

Summary

  • Packaging: ZIP (no rules)
  • ZIP complexity: Low
  • Extension: .zip
  • Supported only by eBraille reading systems
  • Unzippable for browser reading

Scenario 4 : ZIP with custom extension

Summary

  • Packaging: ZIP (no rules)
  • ZIP complexity: Low
  • Extension (example): .ebrl
  • Supported only by eBraille reading systems
  • Unzippable for browser reading