-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GS1 alignment #160
Comments
I'm super glad we have this issue! Just checking : do we know which budget will cover this work? |
Maybe Elzeard? Did they already invoiced something on this? |
@lecoqlibre I don't know for the invoices, I only know it was not listed in the last budget we did. Maybe it was accounted before? |
I don't think we have identified budget as yet. I think this was raised by @David-OFN-CA as a really useful thing to have when we start to talk to larger players, esp. in the North American space. I think we're all in agreement it would be useful - it's going to be an increasingly common question as to why not just use GS1. We need to be clear on points of overlap/alignment & where DFC is better suited to agroecological food producers. |
In the ontology meeting today, we discussed about aligning the DFC's ontology with the one from GS1. It would be nice to have a concrete exemple of a working alignment to see what technical requirements come into play.
We agreed to work on a little test on the catalog use case including these concepts : Catalog, CatalogItem, DefinedProduct.
Some work has already been started to list the equivalent concepts in the ontologies:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mgEvOzWu6h0D4zhtkqrph1aJUFlK-2zJTgynP6qzM3A/edit?gid=0#gid=0
@Alcoz will look at it when possible.
GS1 ontology: https://ref.gs1.org/voc/.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: