You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Per the RFC, data within /.well-known/ is not meant to be a new general namespace, but rather used for service discovery. Hosting non-metadata information such as the specification within /.well-known/ is outside the spirit of the RFC - which is a bit odd for a specification trying to define usage of well-known for a particular purpose.
Generally, if you aren't willing to publish an RFC about a resource under /.well-known/ and have it within the IANA registry, it does not belong under the /.well-known/ path.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree with you. I also don't think this was done intentionally, just a side effect of the repository name and how GitHub pages work with published content 😀
Per the RFC, data within /.well-known/ is not meant to be a new general namespace, but rather used for service discovery. Hosting non-metadata information such as the specification within /.well-known/ is outside the spirit of the RFC - which is a bit odd for a specification trying to define usage of well-known for a particular purpose.
Generally, if you aren't willing to publish an RFC about a resource under /.well-known/ and have it within the IANA registry, it does not belong under the /.well-known/ path.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: