You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I managed to get a similar test case to pass for wvn. I imagine my confusion is that wvn only takes one argument, the electron density n, whereas b88 and lyp takes two arguments, n and gnn. I haven't been able to find any documentation for what that is.
I'm probably doing something wrong here, but I get different values when I add your
b88
andlyp
and compare it against PySCF.Question Can anyone spot my mistake?
I expected the outputs would be the same.
Update: if I change the second argument to
3
it works for some reason. Do you think this is just a coincidence, or is this expected?I managed to get a similar test case to pass for wvn. I imagine my confusion is that
wvn
only takes one argument, the electron densityn
, whereas b88 and lyp takes two arguments,n
andgnn
. I haven't been able to find any documentation for what that is.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: