Resolve terminological inconsistencies

[countvajhula]

In different parts of the paper the development of different "shadows" of the core framework has given rise to terminological inconsistencies between sections, and terminological difficulties stemming from "stretching" previously-defined terms in new situations where they don't apply as neatly, or as parsimoniously. These should be resolved (criteria would be mainly in terms of epistemic levels, but also poetic clarity of the terms and philosophical precedent).

Some examples of terminology that should be resolved:
identity / object / magma: probably "object" for the low-level notion, "identity" for (object, mind) on SL-2
identity context / "object context" / category / "magmaic context" / domain: maybe "subjective context"
epistemic region / epistemic realm
world / realm for "identities (incl. minds) + shared world"
context / brahman / subject / level
axis of levels / contexts / subjects
towers / complexes / communities / hives / cities
identity action / action / "object" action / karma: maybe just "action" or "karma"
i-morphism / morphism / map / function
self / body / jiva
resolution / decision
reasoning / rumination / cognition / cogitation / thinking
maya / nayavada