Converting some MET config items to METplus #1520
-
Hi, there, A colleague of mine has some HYSPLIT (dust) verification working in MET but he never got around to converting to METplus, so I'm doing it. I wanted to check in on converting the configurations. Here are the configurations from the original MET config file: fcst = { field = [ }; field = [ Here is what I have thus far for the METplus configurations: FCST_VAR1_NAME = LIMPF (assume SMALLNUMBER is an actual number like -9999.0 or something The sticking point for me thus far is I can do a censor_thresh and a censor_val, but what do I do when I have three of them like in the obs field? Thanks for any assistance you can provide. Perry |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Hi Perry, And thank you for your question. You've done a great job at transferring the MET configuration options over to the METplus configuration file. To your question, you should be OK to pass in the observation field censor thresholds and values the same way you did with the forecast field:list them inside of brackets, in the order they correspond to each other, with commas between each value:
The substitution logic in METplus should correctly interpret the above line the same way as the MET configuration option you provided. I ran a quick test on a similarly complex censor_thresh/censor_val and it ran successfully. Please let us know if there are any other problems or questions that stem from this conversion process and we'll do our best to help you out. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks, I was able to complete the configuration file and generate stat files for this case. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi Perry,
And thank you for your question. You've done a great job at transferring the MET configuration options over to the METplus configuration file. To your question, you should be OK to pass in the observation field censor thresholds and values the same way you did with the forecast field:list them inside of brackets, in the order they correspond to each other, with commas between each value:
OBS_VAR1_OPTIONS = censor_thresh = [ >-1.5&&<0., >=-3.5&&<=-1.5, <-3.5]; censor_val = [ -9999, 0.000001, -9999 ];
The substitution logic in METplus should correctly interpret the above line the same way as the MET configuration option you provided. I ran a quick test on a similarly complex censo…