We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, the algorithm works well and thanks for the beautiful repo! i notice in a simple packing, a error while choosing the best box.
BOX1:
Inner Width Inner Length Inner Depth
260 415 285
BOX2:
250 425 150
item 1:
"QUANTITY": 2, "WEIGHT": 0.303, "LENGHT": 260, "WIDE": 198
item 2:
"QUANTITY": 2, "WEIGHT": 0.231, "LENGHT": 175, "WIDE": 122, "HEIGHT": 45
with beStrictAboutItemOrdering(true); it chooses the BOX2 (CORRECT) but it show this 3d and the a item is floating in a lot of cases
with beStrictAboutItemOrdering(false); it chooses the BOX1 (WRONT) but this property works for the majority of my cases and 3d is good everytime
Thanks!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the report @DavideWasTaken I'll take a look
Sorry, something went wrong.
hi! do u have some news? thanks!!
No branches or pull requests
Hi, the algorithm works well and thanks for the beautiful repo!
i notice in a simple packing, a error while choosing the best box.
BOX1:
Inner Width Inner Length Inner Depth
260 415 285
BOX2:
Inner Width Inner Length Inner Depth
250 425 150
item 1:
"QUANTITY": 2,
"WEIGHT": 0.303,
"LENGHT": 260,
"WIDE": 198
item 2:
"QUANTITY": 2,
"WEIGHT": 0.231,
"LENGHT": 175,
"WIDE": 122,
"HEIGHT": 45
with beStrictAboutItemOrdering(true); it chooses the BOX2 (CORRECT) but it show this 3d
and the a item is floating in a lot of cases
with beStrictAboutItemOrdering(false); it chooses the BOX1 (WRONT) but this property works for the majority of my cases and 3d is good everytime
Thanks!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: