You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I have a use case where I know the amount of objects to track at all time (N). There can be occlusions, but if waiting long enough, the objects we track will always reappear. I am trying to understand how to modify StrongSORT / SORT tracker to not create new tracks . I initialise the tracks with a certain number of frames where I know all N objects are visible.
The first try was to impeach the creation of any track after the first:
Line 103 of tracker.py
I may suggest the following methods upon StrongSORT:
Limit the number of tracks matched or initialized per frame using N. For example N=5, at frame t, you have 3 tracked tracks and 3 new detections. Then you should delete one detection.
Becasue objects will always reappear, you can add an extra matching procedure, which only uses appearance information.
@dyhBUPT very useful answer. I just had some time to implement the point 1. I indeed now only get N tracks, which is what I hoped to achieve.
I am still trying to understand the point 2. of your answer, but for this I need to read more details about DeepSORT / StrongSORT.
Thanks again for your answer.
Hi,
I have a use case where I know the amount of objects to track at all time (N). There can be occlusions, but if waiting long enough, the objects we track will always reappear. I am trying to understand how to modify StrongSORT / SORT tracker to not create new tracks . I initialise the tracks with a certain number of frames where I know all N objects are visible.
The first try was to impeach the creation of any track after the first:
Line 103 of tracker.py
But this seems to be too stringent, as I only get 2 tracks as output, instead of N.
I see that some discussions in the SORT page relate to this, but there is no clear answer/tip into how to implement (abewley/sort#157).
Any help is very appreciated, thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: